Connected Brains: The Internet of Thoughts

brain

Recap

After writing about wearable technology for introverted intuitives, a lot of interesting discussions came out of that, so in a way this is a part two of that post. The initial idea stems from the experiences and the challenges of the INFJ. This is what it feels like for INFJs I discussed with.

“It happens so many times having valuable insights in my thoughts, and as they usually appear in the middle of a daily task, I don’t always have the time or mood to take notes, and because of this, in the moment I finally write down on paper, those insights will not be the same anymore, it happens the same when verbally communicating those insights to other people”


“I have often thought there should be a device that can capture my thoughts in real time, so I don’t have to write down the jumble of thoughts that go around in my head. I often have creative ideas I would like to store, but when I try to write them down even a few minutes after I have thought them, I cannot seem to recreate the exact same thought. The ‘magic’ is gone”

So that’s what it is about, Braintext will capture thoughts in real time and send them to your designated device, converting it to readable modifiable text.


This is a good post to read when thinking of wearables

Wearable Technology Design Principles


Going further, the discussions morphed into actually connecting brains to each other, of course there is the danger of brain hacking but I’ll focus on the benefits of this.

Connect Our Brains, really?

When I told a friend about this (He is ISTJ) he said that the internet as we know it could be seen as an internet of thoughts, because it is the products of our brains and thoughts that are connected. Fair enough I thought, with a smile, if I didn’t know personality types I may have gone into an argument with him. It is a valid thought, however IOT is specific to situations where the thoughts are connected ‘raw’. Thoughts will connect with thoughts directly.

What I imagine is being able to limit your thought transmission to certain people i.e the device you have (Braintext 2.o) will have to pair with mine, like how Bluetooth technology works. Will it still be hackable? as with all technology there is that possibility, but the mind is more powerful than we give it credit for. I think this might enhance our natural ways of communicating.

Possible Applications: Ability Bridge and Empathy Transfer

This is one of the thoughts that came from the original idea.

“When I initially saw the two persons facing each other wearing the devices, I imagined that the device could be both emitter and receiver, it would be like mind reading, which could be so useful for example in a situation where a person is unable to talk, imagine the benefits for disabled people. Second idea is related with empathy and mirror neurons, imagine if your device could “capture” or “process” somehow the information from those neurons and transmit them to someone who lacks them, for example, autistics.”

The Future

I do think the brain is the final frontier, once we get to understand the workings of it, this world will be something else entirely. For now, as my friend said, “IOT is a nice slogan, I’m waiting for a product that deserves it” We will wait with hope.

Digital Shoreditch: Interaction Lab

I attended Digital Shoreditch on Friday. It was a short time but still packed full with information. The first thing I got up to was Learning how the Microsoft Surface works and the usefulness in design processes and collaboration by interacting with it. We looked at the User issues which include, the Number of Users who can use the surface at a time and the ability to save progress on the device, save sessions or share them on other screens. There are lots of things that be done faster using paper, it seemed really time-consuming for simple tasks. Also the response time wasn’t so great which added to the issue. It was fun at atimes, and I really think it would be a great installment for kids and at use at some facilities, but for personal use or teamwork, it doesn’t rise to the challenge plus the cost is very steep.

Next on we looked at the D-I-Y version of the Surface made by one of the researchers at the Lab. He explained how he put things together but for more details you can see this It was an improvement in functions from the Surface, but the quality of elements must be taken into account. The Surface has better hardware. Still on this D-I-Y form, one could interact throught the internet with the device.

The Second Part, We moved on to the Usability Lab were we looked at devices and systems used for User-testing. I volunteered as the test User for Eye-tracking. It was great seeing how it works and what could be done with it. This particularly was valuable for me as a User Experience Researcher. Later in the day, I had a chat with a UX designer who felt this method of testing was ‘dubious’. It is something I would elaborate on later. We also discussed about how to make the web more inclusive, methods that are already in place and future possibilities. It was a good time out.




Digital Shoreditch – Behind the scenes of a usability and creativity lab

I am going to be attending this event! Anything that gets me closer to my goals, I will partake in. It would be a great learning experience, and I hope I get to interact with UX people.

Friday 6th May 2011 from 12:00 PM – 4PM

Come and see how digital media can be analysed via usability testing. City Interaction Lab have a host of cutting edge technologies which can be used to evaluate how people interact with digital content including eye tracking, mobile testing, multitouch interaction and more! Our creativity pods and various other cool installations will be available, plus some fun exercises to flex your creative brains!

This is an open studio event as part of Digital Shoreditch.

 

Update!

I went and I saw,  blogged here Digital Shoreditch Interaction Labs